Monday, July 02, 2007

CRIKEY: The Oz – Always alarmed but rarely alert?


Today’s front cover of The Australian has a story splashed about a “Home-grown jihad threat”. The story is then referred to in The Oz’s editorial entitled “Vigilance alone will not win this war”.

Both the editorial and the story cite the arrest of a number of Australians by Lebanese authorities for being involved in terrorist activity. The same article and editorial then cite as an authority on radical Muslim youth a young chap who is associated with another Islamist group (known as the al-Ahbash) whose representatives have been arrested in Lebanon in relation to the assassination of Rafik Hariri.

That isn’t all. The Oz claims that Mustapha Kara-Ali ...
... was given a $200,000 grant by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship in June last year.
This is absolute nonsense, and the journalists who wrote the story know it. In fact, Mr Kara-Ali is not the recipient of a single cent of government funding.

This is amateur and sloppy journalism most unbecoming of a national broadsheet. Surely the journalist has an obligation not to just repeat what his source tells him. Surely where the information can be independently verified, the journalist can check the facts.

All Richard Kerbaj et al had to do was look up the website of DIAC and see for themselves that Kara-Ali hasn’t received any money. Further, the grant was actually awarded to al-Amanah College, an independent school run by the Lebanese al-Ahbash sect. The amount awarded was not $200,000 but rather $157,866.

Kerbaj then faithfully reports Kara-Ali’s outlandish claims about “ideological sleeper cells” representing some 3,000 Sunni Muslim youth. No indication is given of how that figure is calculated, what research methodology was used, what criteria were used to determine whether a young person has become radicalised and which ethnic groups are involved in the research.

Most tellingly, Kerbaj doesn’t bother to ascertain whether Kara-Ali is qualified to make such alarmist statements or to carry out such research.

(It’s interesting to note that Kara-Ali’s qualifications are predominantly in engineering. He has no social science, sociology, demography or anthropology qualifications whatsoever.)

Kerbaj doesn’t question Kara-Ali’s statement that
... the Muslim community in Australia is still new.
How can this be when the current Mufti appointed by the Australian National Imams’ Council has lived in Australia since the early 1950’s? And isn’t Kerbaj aware of Albanian and Bosnian (formerly Yugoslav) Muslims who have lived in Australia since the 1920’s?

All in all, it is sloppy journalism, written and presented with a view of supporting a clear editorial slant on these issues.
A version of this was first published in the Crikey daily alert for Monday July 02, 2007.

© Irfan Yusuf 2007

Delicious
Bookmark this on Delicious

Digg!

3 comments:

LDU said...

Hey Irf, great piece mate. The guys down at austrolabe have a good piece on this too. Worth a visit. http://austrolabe.com/2007/07/02/quantifying-the-risks/

Unknown said...

Irfan

Greg Sheridan of the Oz has repeated in an opinion piece this claim of $200K paid to Kara-Ali by DIAC. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,22018579-25377,00.html)


If it's false, DIAC should issue a denial. It's all over the internet that DIAC paid $200K to Kara-Ali, but is it true?

Will somebody from DIAC tell us the true situation?

Irfan, anything you can do to get DIAC to communicate the real answer to the Oz or to draw the Oz's attention to this possible factual error, would be a very important matter to clarify the public record.

Linda Andary said...

"All in all, it is sloppy journalism, written and presented with a view of supporting a clear editorial slant on these issues."

Sloppy journalism, I think not.
Why are you so hot on picking on other people? If you consider yourself are a lawyer, a lecturer in politics and a writer Irfan, why don't you get a job as a journalist? Could you?

Your writing sucks, to say the least. It is does not enlighten the reader nor has it any depth, however, it does provide an annoying, whiney quality, for those who can be bothered to read it.