What kind of blog comments are worth moderating and posting? In Tim Blair's case, they include comments that support terrorism (assassination of world leaders) and mass conversion of people to Christianity.
Blair, opinion editor of Sydnet's Daily Telegraph, hasn't been a happy man of late. At around 7:50pm on the evening of 24 February 2009, he called me to advise I’d made an error in Crikey. Apparently I’d claimed Blair had alleged anonymous leftist were leaving nasty messages on his blog to make him look racist. Blair said that it was not he who made this claim. It was Andrew Bolt. Blair subsequently wrote on his blog about my error, also speculating about my “body weight”.
Blair. of course, doesn’t have nasty leftists on his blog. One of his posts on the terrorist attacks in Pakistan carried this interesting comment exchange:
Nora Charles replied to Brett_McSApparently the comment wasn’t serious. Yeah, right. And apparently supporting terrorism makes you someone of "the highest integrity".
Wed 04 Mar 09
(04:08pm)
Ann Coulter had the right idea in her column on September 13, 2001.
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.
hayesy replied to Brett_McS
Wed 04 Mar 09 (04:15pm)
... Nice try, troll.
Walter Plinge replied to Brett_McS
Wed 04 Mar 09
(04:31pm)
hayesy - you’re a newcomer to this forum I see.
Norah is a long-standing contributor of the highest integrity. Most definitely not a troll.
Infidel Tiger replied to Brett_McS
Wed 04 Mar 09 (04:59pm)
When Coulter first said that it sounded crazy. Now, not so much.
The Ann Coulter line of invasion, assassination and forced conversion is up there with her claims that Canada sent troops to Vietnam and that Jews need to have their faith perfected ...Nora Charles replied to Brett_McS
Wed 04 Mar 09 (05:01pm)
Hi hayesy, The quote from Ann is accurate. My use of it is somewhat tongue in cheek. I’m sorry for the confusion ...
murph replied to Brett_McS
Wed 04 Mar 09 (10:35pm)
I agree Norah. I said on Sept 11 2001, that we should establish beachheads in Morocco, Lebanon & Basra and conduct a war of annihilation as we did with the Nazis and the Japanese in WW2 - destroying and demoralising their culture and their will. We should have let the Indians off the leash as well. The war should have been taken directly to them.The fact is that we are going to have to do this at some time anyhow. We should have done it whilst we have the upper hand.
And in case xenophobia and genocide is your cup of tea, you can read plenty more comments comparing Muslims to Nazis and calling for their elimination at Andrew Bolt’s blog.
Words © 2009 Irfan Yusuf
Bookmark this on Delicious
1 comment:
It's amazing how much it is that you can extrapolate from an off-hand comment. Coulter's 2001 saying was a response to a "gotcha" reporter meant to elicit shocks at the rhetoric employed by jihadists. In other words, it is as it precisely sounds in the inverse.
As for your obsession with the KKK, I might add that they were also the Dixiecrats, and particularly detested Conservatives because they were the least likely to engage in tribal identity politics, and loved the unions for the populist component. They saw strong trade unions as an instrument with which to keep black people out of good-paying jobs.
Let me reiterate: at the time of their worst crimesm, nearly every last Klansmen was a democrat. All you have to do is imagine how they fest about what Lincoln, a Republican, did to their grandparents' world view.
Post a Comment